UTC Hohe Brücke-Gotschlich Strassburg

4facher Kärntner Mannschaftsmeister, Staatsmeister 2008
Subscribe

geocaching dt rating

Dezember 31, 2020 Von: Auswahl: Allgemein

The career stats are inaccurate. We suggest looking for something with a difficulty/terrain rating of D2T2 or under to start off. Add to Compare. Of course, at the time I don't believe that there were any caches in the region that is now South Sudan and there may have been only 1 in all of Sudan (prior to the split). Though a problem with that is that there is no reasonable way to know if a cache's D/T rating has changed. Bei der D/T – Bewertung scheiden sich – eigentlich schon immer – die Geister. Because the point of the difficulty/terrain ratings is not to preserve your precious D/T grid. Sure, sometimes ratings are changed to reflect a real change, but often they are changed because they have just always been inaccurate. Six of one, half a dozen the other. I like the idea of posting a log, and in most cases by default having it use the current data; or if Iknow this is a qualifier I can tell it to 'remember' the current cache properties for my stats. In this instance, both D3 and T3 are respectively the 5th most commonly found. Then if something changes in the future, I don't have to worry about it. I just won't defend it any more, since I'm not even married to it myself and have pretty much no say in how this could get implemented anyway. That's about it the way I see it as a non-GS web app developer. FWIW, this doesn't have to be implemented in the massive storage cost method most people seem to think it would be (via storing the D/T with logs). Upload or insert images from URL. Add to Cart. Back to topic: Why not simply freeze the D-T-rating and attributes of the cache listing (so the cache owner can't change it) when the first found log is written? And it also would help a great deal to allow to add additional hints to a difficult puzzle cache after a while and decreasing the D-rating accordingly wthout annoying those who. This request is precipitated by discussions around losing one's completed grid when a cache's D/T rating is changed: http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=323560. 31 Items . These incidences can also be precipitated by a change to the difficulty or terrain. Dipping The act of logging a trackable into a geocache, and immediately logging it back into one's possession. Allows you to display the geocache list by names or codes. Rating: 100%. If someone wants to cheat by creatimg a dummy account, creating a cache, finding it, changing the D/T and finding again, who cares. Options may have multiple parts separted by a slash ( / ). Add to Cart. Use case 2. From the logger standpoint, it doesn't matter so much whether the new stat is changed with the new physical state, or corrected due to an error. The proposed solution is to implement an additional feature few people will understand, and then "partially mitigate" the additional problems that feature causes by making the feature more and more complicated. Minimal additional data storage. If GS reads these, then the idea is planted, and the implementers can debate the merits. Check out [these important guidelines in the subreddit wiki... jump to content. The CO corrects the D/T ratings and indicates that they should replace the original values. should be null. Geocaching hunts range from simple but exciting challenges to complex problem-solving adventures. Value 1. I'd hardly consider it a massive storage cost. Here were two suggestions that might have mitigated that: [FEATURE] Include D/T rating in Found It log, [FEATURE] Altering placed date as a log type, [FEATURE] Include temporal cache data snapshot in Found It log, (the latter could also include other alterable things like Attributes). Allows you to edit the number of geocaches found. That way, potential seekers have more accurate information more quickly, instead of being forced to use known inaccurate information. I fail to see how frinklab's suggestion would be any more conducive to this alleged "cheating" than the current system. The best GPS for geocaching provides information about latitude and longitude, and … The cost would be in implementation, as well as providing meaningful API methods to access the information, not so much in storage. Ok bad wording on my part; I didn't mean unthinkable amount of data per log, but rather that there's a vastly higher rate of logs posted than listings edited, so storing information that would for the most part be duplicate for every log seems way overboard, when all that's needed is data from the other perspective: The relevant data is tied to the listing, not the log. At some point you have to stop trying to "improve" the feature with additional complications and start considering whether the feature is really that interesting now that we've started to understand how much effort it will take. A CO creates a cache that that requires climbing down and up a steep ravine and gives it a terrain rating of 3.5. GEOCACHING is a hybrid of GEO, for geography, and caching, a term used to describe hiding hiking or camping provisions. A CO creates a cache and inadvertently switches the intended values but doesn't noticed until a month after it's been published. FWIW, I've seen logs that included a sting of characters at the end, where this string of characters encoded information on the state of the cache at the time the finder found it: size, difficulty and terrain ratings, finder's impression of what the difficulty and terrain ratings should have been, subtype (e.g., challenge vs puzzle vs night cache). If you contribute to this wiki, you agree to provide permission to others under this license. No, it wouldn't change anything. However, when it comes to bugs their response is almost always admirably prompt and efficient. All we can do i speculate about the advantages or disadvantages for any implementation strategy. (dreams of ever completing any type of grid...). Geocache List. Then each log just needs to save the checksum of the then-current cache data. × Allows you to edit the number of geocaches found. Currently, there are over 361,000 geocache owners throughout the world. Geocaching Gift Ideas; Gift Certificates; Clearance. The OP would help with this, but I imagine the application for the request is extremely limited and probably not worth the effort. And processing would be a whole lot easier than with your proposed method, too. Geocaching Gift Ideas; Gift Certificates; Clearance. Added options like choosing which date to pull stats by is a minor thing that only people who'd care to use it would need to see it. Positive reviews (last 12 months): 100%. There are more than 3 million active geocaches worldwide.. Geocaches are hidden in 191 different countries on all seven continents (even Antarctica)!. I don't understand the concept of "cheating" in this non-competitive hobby. A 3-star terrain in British Columbia, Canada is most likely going to be a very different experience from a 3-star terrain in Amsterdam, Holland. ie, an inordinate amount of extra duplicate data would be stored if every log contained a snapshot in some form of the cache's data, when all that's needed is a single snapshot per edit. I think a better solution is just to shrug. When you submit a geocache for publication, you must specify ratings for difficulty and terrain using a 5-star scale. Of course the suggestion being this thread isn't perfect - no feature is - but it's not really that hard a module to develop, it's a transparent self-contained back-end add-on to the site under cache listing editing, and the hardest part would be integrating the new change log data with stats generation. I do however agree that the ambiguities with St. Martin/Sint Maarten is worth fixing considering the number of geocaches that are actually impacted. This way you can be sure, your D-T-grid does not change so easily. Take your favorite fandoms with you and never miss a beat. I'd considered that long ago as well, but ouch the amount of data to snapshot with each and every log would be unthinkable. Minimally, the CO wouldn't have to do anything because the change is auto-snapshotted (by whatever trigger/period). Five is the hardest. my subreddits. If the log is to show the D/T at the time of finding then would the stats also need to be calculated based on the log rather than the cache? Yes, because with the new system you could create a sock account, publish a couple of caches, change the D/T ratings while repeatedly finding them, and so fill up your D/T grid with historical finds of a single cache. ... dunno. Alas, I am not employed by GZ. Looking at the threads about people who claim finds when they didn't actually find it, presumably enough people do cheat for it to be considered an issue. More than 642 million "Found it" and "Event Attended" logs have been recorded since the game started in 2000.. Clear editor. Look Up Activation Codes. Or the UI could simply asked the cache owner if the corrected data should be saved or just replaced. Please try to rate your cache accurately. When you submit a geocache for publication, you must specify ratings for difficulty and terrain using a 5-star scale. In any case, it's just an idea in line with this request. Add to Cart. Geocaching ranks 41st among Games sites. They are only cheating themselves. B.   You cannot paste images directly. Quality 1. But I wouldn't store cache data with each and every find log. I like the idea of freezing D/T as well as country and flag on the date of a find. For arguments' sake, if I were only ever finding water caches because I love canoes, I might only ever target 5T caches. Found Geocaches. If this forum is really a black hole, then there's not much point in arguing. Geocaching is a treasure hunting game where you use a GPS to hide and seek containers with other participants in the activity. One is the easiest. Happy Holidays Collection; Wonders of the World; Celebrating 20 Years of Geocaching; Challenges and Milestones; Premium Member Collection; Novelty Items In 2000, after civilian GPS accuracy improved, three friends who worked at a dot-com startup launched Geocaching.com. her having the initial cache info stored when I begin editing, or giving me the option to store the 'new' correct data would be nice and simple. Display as a link instead, × Those that are implementing features at GS often don't participate in discussions but they're the only ones that have access to the code. We here in teh forumz like to make suggestions and discuss them when there are ideas put forward, towards solving what even very few people might consider something worth improving. A terrain rating of 3.5 might be correct before a bridge across a ravine was built, but might not be accurate under the current state of the cache. Allows you to edit the number of geocaches found. Items 61-99 of 99. Add to Compare. A year later a bridge is built over the ravine so the CO changes the T rating to a 2 but want's to keep the 3.5 rating as it indicates the actual terrain rating prior to the bridge being built. 4 Reviews. Found Geocaches. $6.99. The point of the difficulty/terrain ratings is to communicate the general nature of the geocaching experience to potential seekers, so they can better assess whether they should attempt to find the cache. In any case it would/could have an effect on the grids that are shown on diverse stats and badge system sites. Items On sale; Last Chance Items; Account . Use case 2. Overview. The length of the hike is from the most logical parking area to the cache. Because the point of the difficulty/terrain ratings is not to preserve your precious D/T grid. Changing a date on a historic cache (GC2DBE). Why smother it? *shrug* that's the subjective question. 3 Reviews. (again, waxing over this because it's what I do for a living; not really intent on any of this actually being implemented in whatever way, though it would be nice to have, even if YMMV, and for me at least, it's fun to work through). Recently Added. Garmin eTrex 30x 010-01508-10 Handheld Navigator Review. $19.99. Does the benefit of the feature as a whole being developed for the community outweigh any potential problem(s) and preventative measures? Are you suggesting that the current implementation makes it harder to cheat at the incidental side games? I don't see how the suggestion offers a useful benefit - it seems like a redesign of the system just for the sake of a side game. This will be the go to place for charts, top lists, statbars, compares, achievements and map tools. Select the option based on the most difficult parts of the cache. $1.99. Just makes it easier to cheat at the incidental side games. There's no cash prize to be won, no trophies to be awarded, so "cheating" would be rather pointless. As a CO, knowing people may be needing certain stats, if I change something the cache listing I make sure to include a note with the date of the change and what was changed - this was more relevant before automated statistic checking was required, for any challenge owner to decide whether a qualifying user can use my edited cache or not (or verify prior qualifications that no longer qualify) - but I generated my own 'change log' for the record, being considerate of challenge cachers. Visit Geocaching.com to see just how many geocaches are nearby and to learn how to start finding them. Add your rating See all 5 kid reviews. Snowflake Ornament Geocoin - Earth . The point of the difficulty/terrain ratings is to communicate the general nature of the geocaching experience to potential seekers, so they can better assess whether they should attempt to find the cache. I just don't agree with the new D/T rating, and sure don't feel like we "earned" it. Problem: Occasional legit mistakes being corrected may be snapshotted. We had the opposite of most people...a cache we found that was probably only a 1/1.5 when we found it originally has been moved and the Terrain upped to 2.0/4.0. The Geocache Rating Calculator is designed to help cache hiders calculate the difficulty and terrain rating of a geocache. Positive. That to me makes more sense. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. So a heavy user would hit that extra hop 62,000 times a day and that wouldn't load the system. From what I've seen this issue arises most when a CO changes a property and someone no longer qualifies or don't like that there's a hole in their stats. This will be the go to place for charts, top lists, statbars, compares, achievements and map tools. Visit Geocaching.com to see just how many geocaches are nearby and to learn how to start finding them. It’s one of the best GPS devices for geocaching if you’re on slightly more of a budget but still after a quality Garmin product. UPDATED RANKING https://www.fishfindly.com Best Seller in 2020 https://amzn.to/2WXn8FM Disclaimer: These choices may be out of date. Service 1. Based on this grouping, I think it would be fair to say that they consider a "feature suggestion" to be just as problematic as a "bug". Remember when South Sudan split off from Sudan? Best GPS for Geocaching to Buy in 2019 (Top 8 Reviews) The best GPS for geocaching is a device that allows determining the location of a person or an object in different parts of the world. Skip to … Bumping this thread to suggest an enhancement to the feature that could snapshot all the cache's data at the time the log is posted, not just D/T. A CO creates a cache and inadvertently switches the intended values but doesn't noticed until a month after it's been published. These ratings start at 1 and go up to 5 with 1 being the easiest, and 5 being the toughest. The relevant edit data is per cache, and if having a flag for a log for which data to use (by log date or current) then that would be per log. It would be a feature only relevant to those for whom it's relevant, in the rare cases it ever happens. Every time the cache data changes (which should be relatively rare), the system could snapshot the data, and create a checksum identifying the snapshot. This registers miles traveled on a trackable. As a software developer, this seems like a fun problem to solve. I think there's zero chance that D/T ratings or country ID for a cache will ever be frozen. Meanwhile, it might be enough to know if and when the D/T has been altered. Later a CO decides their series is no longer 5T because the water level has lowered, and the stats are now skewed to easy walks. Geocaching has a consumer rating of 4.5 stars from 6 reviews indicating that most customers are generally satisfied with their purchases. It's an alternative solution that reaps other useful benefits besides helping 'incidental side games' (of which, I'm obviously not a serious contender). For example: Geocaching Wiki is a FANDOM Games Community. Add to Compare. Fill this form with your Geocaching account information. A year later a bridge is built over the ravine so the CO changes the T rating to a 2 but want's to keep the 3.5 rating as it indicates the actual terrain rating prior to the bridge being built. If the Difficulty is only changed once 3 years after publish and it gets another 2 years of life before archival, it's easy for the system to determine that Find logs posted pre-change used the first D, and those after used the updated D. No need to snapshot duplicate data for every log. $19.99. Select Setup > Geocaches. Then queries for a user's D/T statistics only need to take one extra hop to get data "as of" their find date. ie. I wasn't thinking of the log poster making a determination which data to use, rather that the CO could choose not to save data that was erroneous, but keep the old data if something actually changed. A CO creates a cache that that requires climbing down and up a steep ravine and gives it a terrain rating of 3.5. In addition, most of those modeled after the original Well Rounded Cacher Challenge, disallow including caches that have had their D/T ratings changed. There are, of course, pros and cons to any solution for this. Thanks for reminding me. In the dynamics of an ever changing political world, and human ability to war incessantly, countries and territories will continue to evolve and political boundaries will change. There are millions of geocaches worldwide, just waiting for you to find them. Geocache List. Add to Compare.   Your link has been automatically embedded. Events are in plain sight or can be found in a few minutes of searching, so the appropriate difficulty rating for events is one star. All Rights Reserved. St. Louis Area Geocachers Association (SLAGA), https://geocaching.fandom.com/wiki/Terrain_Rating?oldid=5308. $9.99. Find-a-Cache.   Your previous content has been restored. I dunno. Project-GC is a site with the goal to provide statistics and tools for all the geocachers in the world. We're only talking about 35 caches or so. But even ignoring all the logging and stat stuff - as a database dev, it does still irk me that there's no changelog for caches (to whatever detail), and that user find statistics aren't actually describing the statistics of the user's finds, only the current properties of caches that the user has marked as found. Even sensible, well-supported, useful features are ignored, like the one for managing ghost trackables. As far as country and flag, I mention it to see if there is support for freezing similarly to date of a find, and clearing up amiguities such as St.Martin / Sint Maarten, and the other 'nations' that comprised Netherlands Antilles. Geocaching Gift Ideas; Gift Certificates; Clearance. Assuming you took one byte each for D and T (though theoretically one byte is enough to store both, if you want to be stingy), with the number of logs currently in the database it adds up to just on 1Gb of extra data -- a rounding error when you consider the storage required for the log text itself. Trackables. I appreciate the support, but I think the thread's still needed to make the case to the people proposing the new feature. So the default would be stats as of the log date, but w/an option to use current cache stats. You mean like, give the log poster options to choose which data snapshot they'd like to keep with the log? Celebrating 20 Years of Geocaching Micro Geocoin . Even the owner of a challenge who knows someone is cheating should only laugh at someone's ability to cheat themselves. Geocache List. Bugs me when people say "it's not a problem/a big enough problem" and just dismiss any ideas outright. Found Geocaches. Geocaching Gift Ideas; Gift Certificates; Clearance. Therefore, a D1/T1 rating would be the easiest geocache to find, while a D5/T5 difficulty/terrain rating would be the most difficult. The log's only interest is the lookup date, so snapshot the cache data before the edits are saved and store with the edit date. Maybe there should be two forums -- one for bug reports that they can monitor, and one for feature suggestions which can be ignored? Rating: 100%. Honestly, Groundspeak seem so good at breaking things with their releases I shudder to think of the consequences of changing the table containing cache logs. Every cacher doesn't have to 'learn' something new. On the CO side, if it's a mistake, I would think that either having the initial cache info stored when I begin editing, or giving me the option to store the 'new' correct data would be nice and simple. Our support team will reply as soon as possible. Geocaching by the numbers. Condor Side Kick Geocaching Pouch- Green . If so, does that history include changes to the D/T? Copyright © 2000-2020 Groundspeak, Inc. DBA Geocaching. edit subscriptions. Well, then I guess there's no need for this thread then! Conclusion: Both apps restrict basic members, so premium membership is a huge advantage to get the most out of both 14. Powered by Invision Community, at the end of the day this is a "bugs and features discussion" forum, Those that are implementing features at GS often don't participate in discussions, Of course the suggestion being this thread isn't perfect - no feature is. Skip the timestamp, just reference the GMT (+00:00) datestamp. 1 Review. Whereas I've always come at it from the angle of the log poster; the challenge/stats cacher. If that 'system' is immitated and automated with cache edits on the server end, I see it being more beneficial than not; but that's IMO. 4 Reviews. The Geocaching® App also restricts basic members in relation to cache types, as well as DT ratings, and there is no enhanced filtering or searching which the Cachly app still allows for basic members. All elements of an option do not have to apply to your cache. If it changes afterword it's effect on grid completion, challenges, etc. If there's a "snapshot" at log time of what was the cache's D/T rating, this becomes a non-issue. If the only way you can fill the D/T grid and thereby qualify for a challenge cache is to host an event with a spurious D4.5/T3.5 rating the problem is the grid and the challenge - fix those and the incentive to put silly ratings on events disappears. Exactly. Add to Cart. Geocache ratings vary from one community to the next. I was going back through suggestion threads to try and find an example of relevant participation in a new feature discussion (which doesn't include indications that there is "no commitment to put it on the schedule to develop" or "currently in the brainstorming phase"). Instead, the cache record itself could store a history of D/T ratings (or heck, a history of previous revisions of the whole cache: description, coords, everything).

Progesteron Macht Schlank, Hotel Moselblick Mit Hund, Bester Tschechischer Fussballspieler, Hotel Post Bezau Mitarbeiter, Sweatshorts Damen C&a, Online It-kurse Mit Zertifikat, Stadt Menden Stellenangebote, Handbuch Innere Führung 1957, Ibis Hamburg City, 6 Ssw Unterleibsschmerzen,

Keine Kommentare erlaubt.